Hypothetical Notification Design

Last modified 08 Jul 2022 16:57 +02:00

This document is related to Notification Redesign effort. It is a hypothetical future design.

Main design points

  • Message template is separate, potentially usable outside notifications, and supports localized messages.

  • Transports are configured separately (can be used by other parts than notifications as well) and only referenced from notification configuration. Transport configuration for all notifications can still be amended, e.g. to add file debugging.

  • Notification configuration can be roughly similar, just using the things above, but template can be chosen per transport.

  • Runtime-wise, instead of Messages being created from an Event, the service will first create Notifications and then Messages for them - both of these are persisted.

    • Notifications are created from events after filtering and are created per recipient.

    • Messages are created per transport using either the default notification template or specific template for the transport.

  • Messages are not part of notification, but part of message/transport mechanism, shared with reporting and possibly other parts of midPoint.

  • Notifications are inherently presentable in UI, even without transports, so transport need not be configured for purely in-app notifications.

    • Default message (used for UI) is created using the template referenced in the notification. It is unclear whether this should be separately stored Message (as it is not transport related) or somehow inlined in the Notification. I prefer the latter, also delivery state of such "message" can clearly be ignored as the notification state is enough.

  • Aggregate notifications are created from stored notification - no detailed design yet.

    • Additional template for aggregate notification is needed, but how to provide the input info again (original Events are not available anymore, unless stored, which is questionable).

    • Alternatively, there can be just some summary info like "n notifications total, x of this type, first one was …​, last one was …​". Summary text would not require any additional event info.

  • Message delivery timing is configured for transport, user can override the config for his messages - no detailed design yet.

Configuration

MessageTemplate configuration is based on newly introduced object stored in the repository. It is not part of the system configuration anymore - templates are referenced by OID (or by name from user’s perspective).

notification hypo design templates
Figure 1. Structures for message template configuration

Transport configuration differences from current version:

  • Transport config is placed outside notification configuration in its own section.

  • Multiple transports of the same type must be possible.

  • Custom/file transport can still be supported just like in current version.

Whole transport mechanism should be in separate module, or at least separate API. Message is concept from transport package/module.

Notification configuration can be similar to the current one, supporting the existing features. Main changes are:

  • Notification configuration specifies template reference instead of defining it.

    • Do we want to allow inlining content of the template specification there? I’d rather not and provide some elegant solution in the GUI.

  • Template can be specified per transport, otherwise default template is used.

  • Debug or other options can be added per transport. This is important to be able to debug for instance email notifications without affecting email reports. (Debug on transport level is possible too, of course.) These transport options can be specified for all notifications, it’s probably overkill to do so for each notification handler and it would definitely be impractical if there was no option to do it globally for all notifications.

  • Handler configuration does not specify recipient address, only recipient(s). Addresses are extracted as specified in the transport configuration. Address extractor expression can be provided by the handler configuration if necessary (is it?).

  • Various notifier implementations (from notifications-impl, not schema) are marked as @Component. It would be possible to create them based on the system configuration without being managed components.

  • Custom notifier class can be used, specifying the class in the configuration (similar to custom transport).

Transport

Transport support in midPoint can be represented by a service which can be called from other parts (reports). This service acts as a registry and knows how to dispatch the Message to the specified transport (by its name or some kind of id or key). Current implementation uses @Component annotation on various transport implementations which is not flexible. Instead, transports should be various implementations instantiated as required by the configuration and registered with the TransportService.

notification hypo design transport
Figure 2. Transport service

Notifications

(This part was not implemented in 4.5.)

The major difference compared to the current implementations are:

  • In addition to Message objects, there are also Notification objects created from the notification Event.

  • Both Notification and Message objects are stored - they are now prism structures (probably just containers).

  • Storage details are less important now, but it would be something similar to audit, possibly with partitioning.

notification hypo design service
Figure 3. Notification service
  • Message association is possibly aggregation or composition, perhaps we don’t need notification messages when notification is deleted.

  • Message type is not exclusive for Notification, the same structure can be used for sending for instance email reports. This dictates the association direction, Notification knows about its messages, but the Message does not care.

  • State of the notification and messages are tracked separately and their semantics is slightly different. Messages are all about being delivered, notifications can be read in GUI and marked as such or even deleted.

Was this page helpful?
YES NO
Thanks for your feedback